MNAI Communities

Town of Gibsons, British Columbia

The community that start it all.  Gibsons is blessed with many natural assets, which form a fundamental part of the Town’s infrastructure. The Gibsons Aquifer, for example, provides water storage and filtration, while delivering drinking water so pure it meets health standards without any chemical treatment.  Creeks and woodlands help manage the rainwater. And the foreshore area of the beaches acts as a natural seawall.  Click here for more information on the work they’ve completed to date on natural asset management.

Cohort 1 Project Communities

These communities are currently in the process of completing their pilot projects:

City of Nanaimo, British Columbia

A key objective for the City of Nanaimo relates to understanding, and maximizing municipal services from the Buttertubs Marsh Conservation Area, a 55 HA/133 acre reclaimed wetland/floodplain in the center of the City. Prior to the MNAI pilot, City efforts related to the Marsh focused primarily on maintaining open water habitat, inventorying and restoring natural biodiversity, and removing invasive species. No costing estimates for the value of stormwater management or other services had been conducted.

The City of Nanaimo wanted to answer a number of management questions through the project, including:

  • How resilient is the Marsh to future storm events; how well can it manage in different storm scenarios?
  • What is the value of the services provided from the Marsh; if these services were degraded, what costs would need to be incurred elsewhere by the City? Conversely, if they were enhanced, would there be savings to the City?
  • What is the value of the wetland’s water retention properties? Does it offset future capital expenditures and / or justify any land acquisition?
  • What is the value of the Marsh in terms of assuring downstream water quality?

To the extent possible with the model and data availability, these questions are addressed in the context of other natural and engineered components of the sub-watershed.

Click here to read Nanaimo’s case study.

District of West Vancouver, British Columbia

The District contains 13 watersheds, each with numerous tributaries. Some tributaries are in a natural state, and others are channeled through underground pipes and culverts. The ecological benefits of returning streams to above ground channels or “daylighting” and returning them to a more natural state are well-documented. They can include improvements to water quality, flood mitigation and habitat creation. The financial case for local governments to daylight streams, by contrast, is not well-documented.

The District’s objectives relate to a covered 90-metre tributary to a creek near an elementary school. The District hopes to understand the financial and risk management case in terms of avoided future asset replacement costs for daylighting the tributary as well as the potential benefits in terms of increased habitat for cutthroat trout and coho salmon species.

Management questions the District wants to answer through the process include:

  • Determining the value of the services provided by the stream in its natural (daylighted) state versus the value of the services in its current covered form; and versus the size and type of pipe that would be required to meet current standards /
  • Developing a simple model that can be used elsewhere in the District and in other areas, to estimate the financial value of daylighted versus covered assets?

Click here to read the District of West Vancouver’s case study.

Grand Forks, British Columbia

The City’s principle interest is to start the process of integrating natural assets into its overall asset management plan. Water-related issues were already topical in Grand Forks as the City aquifer had been damaged due to gas contamination. Accordingly, the City chose to focus on an oxbow wetland in the center of the urban area. The wetland represents a substantial series of assets in the center of Grand Forks, one that links to the interconnected issues of stormwater, aquifer health, localised flooding and the quality of fish-bearing streams.

Management questions that the City wanted to address through the pilot project included:

  • What is the value of the services (quantity, flood control, drought control) provided from the wetland; if these services were degraded, what costs would need to be incurred elsewhere by the City?
  • What is the value of the wetland’s water retention properties? Does it offset future capital expenditures and / or justify any land acquisition?
  • What is the value of the oxbow wetland in terms of assuring downstream water quality for both fish-bearing rivers and wetland / touristic areas bordering the Kettle River?

Click here to read Grand Forks’ case study.

Region of Peel, Ontario

The Regional Municipality of Peel (population approximately 1,000,000) is a regional municipality in Southern Ontario, Canada. The pilot area is the Credit River Watershed located for the most part within the Region of Peel. The CRW is approximately 1000 km2 in size with 22 sub-watersheds. Given the large watershed size and correspondingly high data requirements, the pilot focussed on an urban and rural sub-watershed. The Region of Peel – together with partner organization Credit Valley Conservation Authority (CVCA) – had as its principle interest the integration of natural assets into asset management frameworks. As with the City of Grand Forks, water issues were already topical as costs associated with storm events and infrastructure increased due to the impacts of climate change, growth and development.

Management questions that the Region and CVCA are exploring include:

  • What is the value of the services in financial terms provided by the natural assets in the sub-watersheds with respect to avoidance of flooding/erosion, maintenance of clean water (quality) and maintenance of base-flow (quantity)?
  • What are the management options with a view to maximization of these services?
  • How will observed climate change trends impact the natural assets and the services they provide?
  • What are the operations and maintenance costs associated with the management options associated with the natural assets for each scenario?

Click here to view Peel’s case study.

Town of Oakville, Ontario

Intensification of land use in Oakville, primarily in the form of larger homes than traditional norms, is putting increased pressure on the existing storm water system. As new, larger homes are built, there may be a corresponding and tangible loss of storm water service to the municipality through reductions in permeable surface to absorb and manage the water.

The pilot area is fully urbanized, and so the natural assets that form the basis of the pilot include: publicly-owned ditches, green spaces, tree canopy and the remnants of once-intact streams; and, privately held natural assets such as streams and ditches on the property of individual landowners.

Management questions that Town of Oakville is exploring through the MNAI initiative include:

  • What is the value to the Town of the loss of municipal services created by the conversion of existing natural assets, and is there any corresponding financial risk and/or liability to Oakville?
  • What can be learned from the remnant stream in the pilot area that would help Oakville better prioritize and manage other streams in the community?
  • Can the monetization of municipal services create a basis for new municipal strategies to manage natural assets?

Click here to read Oakville’s case study.

Cohort 2 Project Communities

These communities are just beginning their pilot projects.